This requires that they advocate for social media filtering mechanisms designed to expose misinformation cloaked in the robe of fact. Without rules and guidelines in place, social media is a rogue platform with nuclear capability. Our judicial system has always had a shadow forum-- the court of public opinion. This is especially so in high profile cases. The OJ Simpson murder trial, for example, was played out in the media long before it reached the courthouse.
- British Elections & Parties Review: The 2001 General Election: 12 (British Elections and Parties Review).
- » Dhiraj Murthy’s Bio and Publications iSociology.
- The Body of Christ - Library of Adventist Theology.
Imagine if the OJ case were tried in the social media age? Social media presents several challenges for our judicial system. How can an impartial jury be impaneled in high-profile cases? How can jurors separate what they have seen, read, or heard on social media from the evidence presented in court? How are trial leaks contained? Trial proceedings, of course, are governed by rules.
Six ways Twitter has changed the world
The hearsay rule, for example, is designed to exclude from out-of-court statements not subject to cross-examination. Trials are based upon facts—what can be established by proof—not unsupported allegations. Evidence, likewise, is admitted based upon relevance and reliability and excluded when prejudicial impact eclipses materiality. The objective is to for decisions to be fact based and upon evidence that is material, not inflammatory. The court of public opinion that social media energizes has no such rules. Researchers analyzed more than , news articles written by journalists at 25 news outlets, searching for terms they say represent a strong right- or left-leaning ideology.
Twitter: Social Communication in the Twitter Age
The authors stress that they find no evidence that following certain Twitter accounts causes a reporter to write with bias. Most of the 25 publications studied demonstrated a liberal-leaning bias. Do people remember where they get their news? And why does it matter? Researchers from the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism examine these two questions. Today, there are lots of ways people can look for and access news, including through search engines, news aggregators, social media, and mobile messaging apps.
Kalogeropoulos, Fletcher and Nielsen wanted to see how well people remember the name of the media outlet that produced a news report they found via a search engine or social media. For a month in early , they tracked the browsing histories of 6, adults in the United Kingdom who agreed to install tracking software on their laptop or desktop computers. The researchers also surveyed participants 10 to 48 hours after they visited a news story.
How the president’s Twitter account affects civil society
But when they found a news report via a search engine, they were only able to correctly identify the news outlet 37 percent of the time. When they discovered a news item on social media, they remembered the name of the news organization that produced it 47 percent of the time. The researchers also found that younger people were more likely to remember the news brands of news reports they accessed directly and found through social media.
Individuals with higher education levels were more likely to remember the outlets that produced news they located via search engine. These findings have implications for public trust in news and for the news business, the researchers explain. By Yanfang Wu.
Policy platforms do change with any presidential transition as the incoming administration advances its own agenda. Yet in the short time since President Trump has taken office, factions of civil society—the array of non-governmental organizations that have a presence in public life—have engaged in daily protests against a range of enacted and anticipated legislative and regulatory rollbacks. And the digital infrastructure that was designed to bridge civil society and government has been seemingly reduced to a unilateral platform for mass communication.
Absent of two-way communication, current acts of civil disobedience will continue among segments of civil society that feel alienated from government. Whatever the era, presidential leadership has recognized the importance of engaging civil society in its entirety.
In , Harry S. Less than 10 days after taking office, George W. Bush gathered religious leaders to launch his conservative faith-based initiative.
During the Obama presidency, from the campaign trail to the White House, the internet transformed mass communication between government and citizens. Obama was also the first leader to go live on Facebook, use a filter on Snapchat, deliver his weekly national address on You Tube, and share photos on Instagram. The administration also inherited a revamped WhiteHouse.